Thread: list of confirmed units

list of confirmed units

  1. #101
    Originally Posted by Arrow
    I think we agree for the most part that if they're in the original BSM, they're in BSP too. Especially if Penn is popular.
    The bismarck is one of the most talk about ship in these forums and it might not end up in BSP

    On strategywiki it says that the Brooklyn-class CL and the Baltimore-class CA where confirmed and i was just wondering if anyone can back it up

  2. #102
    Originally Posted by SuperE
    It was in the second trailer but it was hard to tell since they look a lot alike
    Where around in the vid it is, i think i might be able to make it out wich one it is, since im having bit hard time to catch the glimpse where it might be.

  3. #103
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,444
    Originally Posted by SuperE
    The bismarck is one of the most talk about ship in these forums and it might not end up in BSP

    On strategywiki it says that the Brooklyn-class CL and the Baltimore-class CA where confirmed and i was just wondering if anyone can back it up
    Yeah, but the Bismarck isn't in BSM. I said that anything in BSM is likely to be in BSP.

    And as for Strategywiki, I highly doubt it. Right now its information is screwed. I'll clean it up when the release comes around.

  4. #104
    Originally Posted by YUKIMURA300
    It should be noted that Shinano is the larget "catch" by a Submarine ever.
    In terms of raw tonnage absolutely. It's just too bad Shinano would have been pretty useless as an aircraft carrier anyway, since it could only carry some 46 or so planes. Carriers half its size could carry twice that.

    I hope Colorado will be in the game, though more likely they'll go with one of the older Standards like NM or Penn. Hopefull both.

  5. #105
    Sorry I took another look at the trailer and it was the Northampton at a weird angle

  6. #106
    Originally Posted by SuperE
    The bismarck is one of the most talk about ship in these forums and it might not end up in BSP

    On strategywiki it says that the Brooklyn-class CL and the Baltimore-class CA where confirmed and i was just wondering if anyone can back it up
    lol i just saw a superE DD on strategy wiki

  7. #107
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,444
    Originally Posted by Polarshark
    lol i just saw a superE DD on strategy wiki
    I dunno what kind of an idiot added that, but thanks to my super-admin powers, I reverted him.

    Okay, I lied, anyone could have done that. >.>

  8. #108
    hope u guys are happy looks like the

    AVENGERS are confirmed

    http://www.gamespot.com/pages/image_...&img=7&popup=1

  9. #109
    Nevada Bb Where Are You?

  10. #110
    Originally Posted by Der_BB_MAN
    Nevada Bb Where Are You?
    its obviously not in this picture

  11. #111
    Originally Posted by Polarshark
    hope u guys are happy looks like the

    AVENGERS are confirmed

    http://www.gamespot.com/pages/image_...&img=7&popup=1
    yaay

  12. #112
    there has been some new stuff out since i last made a list i have the planes but i am not to good with the ships and subs so if people will give the new ones so i can make a list
    ( new unit * )
    total confirmed planes
    USA
    F4u cousir
    F6f hellcat
    sb2c helldiver
    SBD Dautlies
    TBD dev
    p 40 warhawk
    dc3*
    b17*
    tbf avenger*
    p38 *
    f4f wildcat*
    catlina seaplane*
    IJN
    am6 zero
    shriden
    J2m raiden ( not spelled right )
    geko
    betty
    judy *
    val
    kate
    nell
    oscar
    pete floatplane

    unconfirmed units
    b25
    b24
    some type of seaplane for the us that can be lanched from ships
    swordfish
    hurrricane
    emily
    jake
    ki 44

  13. #113
    Confirmed ships

    Allied

    BB King George V
    BB Renown
    BB Iowa
    BB South Dakota
    CV Yorktown
    CVE Bogue
    CA Northhampton
    CL Atlanta
    CL Cleveland
    CL De Ruyter
    DD Fletcher
    DD Bagley
    DD Clemson

    Japanese

    BB Yamato
    BB Kongo
    BB Fuso
    CV Soryu
    CA Mogami
    CA Takao
    CA Tone
    CL Kuma
    DD Fubuki (Has been modified two AA guns in back have been turned into one triple mount)
    One more ship maybe a destroyer hard to tell because of smoke

    This is a list from all of the pitcures and trailers of Battlestations Pacific if I missed any please tell me.

  14. #114
    Hope the following ships will be confirmed,otherwise the Pearl Harbor mission is a EPIC FAIL

    USS Arizona BB39 (Pennsylvannia class)
    USS California BB44 (Tennessee class)
    USS Maryland BB46 (Colorado class)
    USS West Virginia BB48 (Colorado class)
    USS Oklahoma BB37 (Nevada class)
    USS Nevada BB36 (class leader)
    USS Pennsylvania BB38 (class leader)

  15. #115
    Dude, if so much as one Standard got in the game i'd be all over it. The forgotten battleships, they laid the groundwork for all US capital ship design over the next 30 years. The Pearl Harbor mission would be LAME if I saw Iowas in the harbor with the name "Maryland" or "West Virginia". The thing is they don't even really need to feature all of the Standards. Pennsylvania and Colorado are the only ones that really matter, since they were the final designs of their lineage. (Nevada to Penn, Tenn to Colorado).

    Speaking of failed substitutes, anybody else remember that lame Pearl Harbor movie Bay did a couple of years ago? Remember seeing Ticonderogas and other guided missile cruisers during the Japanese attack? LOL.

  16. #116
    I was LOLing already when I saw New York class BB's with the name of Oklahoma,Arizona,Pennsylvannia,California,Nevada, Maryland,West Virginia and Tennessee

    I'd give Bay's Pearl Harbor movie a .4/10

  17. #117
    I was mad that New York didn't have secondary guns I hope they change that for the new game

  18. #118
    Originally Posted by Der_BB_MAN
    Hope the following ships will be confirmed,otherwise the Pearl Harbor mission is a EPIC FAIL
    Well, New York was plausible for the pearl harbor, but in IL-2... We dont even have New York class, or Iowa. NO. The whole harbor is filled with King George V Class battleships with Fletchers and one northampton.. I just cant take the fail of that mission and quit.

  19. #119
    Originally Posted by CaptHawkeye
    Dude, if so much as one Standard got in the game i'd be all over it. The forgotten battleships, they laid the groundwork for all US capital ship design over the next 30 years. The Pearl Harbor mission would be LAME if I saw Iowas in the harbor with the name "Maryland" or "West Virginia". The thing is they don't even really need to feature all of the Standards. Pennsylvania and Colorado are the only ones that really matter, since they were the final designs of their lineage. (Nevada to Penn, Tenn to Colorado).
    Thing is, if models of the Pennsylvania and Colorado where put in the game then it would be relatively simple to adapt them to represent the other 3 classes of standard type. It would be possible to start with a single hull and adapt it with different bow shapes, superstructures and armaments to obtain accurate models of all the classes, though a shortened hull would be needed for the Nevadas.
    Speaking of failed substitutes, anybody else remember that lame Pearl Harbor movie Bay did a couple of years ago? Remember seeing Ticonderogas and other guided missile cruisers during the Japanese attack? LOL.
    Not to mention using a shot of US supercarriers as Kido Butai.

  20. #120
    Another thing I am hoping that will make the game better

    US
    Nevada class (if included)
    Wyoming class (if included)
    North Carolina class (if included)
    New Mexico class (if included)
    Iowa class
    South Dakota class
    Pennsylvania class (if included)
    Colorado class (if included)
    Tennessee class (if included)

    IJN
    Ise class

    I think the game can do better that Battlestations Midway

  21. #121
    Originally Posted by David603
    Speaking of failed substitutes, anybody else remember that lame Pearl Harbor movie Bay did a couple of years ago? Remember seeing Ticonderogas and other guided missile cruisers during the Japanese attack? LOL.

    Not to mention using a shot of US supercarriers as Kido Butai.
    Heck, if you want a good WW2 movie that is related to the pearl harbor attack, i warmly recommend the Tora Tora Tora, i think it is one of the best, at least i haven't noticed any "futuristic" stuff in the movie.

  22. #122
    Originally Posted by W4lt3r89
    Heck, if you want a good WW2 movie that is related to the pearl harbor attack, i warmly recommend the Tora Tora Tora, i think it is one of the best, at least i haven't noticed any "futuristic" stuff in the movie.
    haha that is a good movie, better than Pearl Harbor (movie)

  23. #123
    You all make me very sad, not one of you have mentioned the USS Utah

  24. #124
    Originally Posted by SuperE
    You all make me very sad, not one of you have mentioned the USS Utah
    I suppose that the New York model could be adapted to represent the Utah, but I don't think that it would be worth making a proper unit model for a ship that wouldn't be controllable and would only appear once in the game.

  25. #125
    I think he was just angry we "forgot" about Utah. It's not like we'd be using it anyway, since Utah was more or less retired and wouldn't be used in a war under any circumstances.

    In fact, i'll see his Utah and raise him Wyoming. The old coal battleship converted into a convoy escort and training ship. Removed all of her primaries and replaced them with tiny destroyer DP guns.

Page 5 of 8 First First 12345678 Last